HOWARD KAYLAN: A TURTLES MARVELOUS, MUSICAL LIFE It was. It was great. Im sure we took more time ruminating about it than we deserved to. But its the little things like that that make for vinyl collectors. Ive collected vinyl all my life. I think its a real important thing. I dont dismiss it. I never sold any of my 45s... ever. I had a big auction, years ago, where I sold off a bunch of albums. And I kind of regret that, because I had thousands, literally thousands of vinyl albums that I had to put into lots, because nobody appreciated how wonderful it was to put on a vintage Bloodstone album and listen to it. Maybe nobody but me appreciates that. But thats the wonderful thing about being a record collector all your life - youve got all of those memories, all of those triggers that are like sense memory activators. And I can remember generally, when I hear any song, not just my own, where I was when that song was first on the radio, what I was doing, who I was going out with, what kind of car I was driving. Memories are really important for that kind of stuff. And Im not sure that the kids today are making memories, necessarily. Im thrilled that theyre going out and buying our stuff, because we can give them our memories and, in a Twilight Zone way, transfer our knowledge or our appreciation to them. But, you know, years and years from now, I cant imagine, at anybodys senior prom, that theyre going to be all dancing to Thrift Shop. I just cant picture it. I dont see it in the cards. Maybe they will. Maybe Im wrong. But maybe the music of the 60s was the greatest era around. Maybe the 80s was the second best era around. I cant even comment anymore. Im way too close to it. All I know is, Im still thrilled to be a part of what I consider a very worthwhile generation to be from. And I wish I could impart what that feels like to everybody whos wondering what it was like. This is one step closer. I think if you read the book that I wrote or watch the movie that I put out, maybe there are two other glimpses into The Turtles and the life in the 60s and what it was like growing up in Laurel Canyon and all that kind of stuff. But sonically, as close as youre going to get is this 45s collection, absolutely. This is as close to sitting down, cross-legged on my rug on Lookout Mountain Avenue in Laurel Canyon and listening to the records the day they came out, wondering if they were going to be hits. PCC: At the time, did you realize there was something enduringly magical happening in music? Something that might never happen again? KAYLAN: Well, we knew from day one, when we were 17 years old and It Aint Me Babe came out and did well that this was something that was probably never going to happen again. We werent sure that we were ever going to have a second record. But we did, and then a third record and a few in between, before we even found Happy Together. That was like our second coming. And by the time we reached 1968, 69, Elenore and You Showed Me and Battle of the Bands and the Ray Davies album, was like our third coming onto the charts. I really couldnt believe that believe any one of those three passes, quite frankly. They were all magical. And it wasnt my imagination. There was something magical going on, not just about the records we were making, but about the music in general and about the feeling in America. It was a really special time. And it was a wonderful time to be involved in the music of it, because we were just a part of a much bigger thing. And the movement was taking us, more than we were carrying any of our followers along to the movement. I mean, we were really getting swept up in it as much as they were. We wanted to be The Beatles. We were as close as we could get to being The Beatles without literally changing our name to be spelled the same way. We did everything that they did. If they put horns on their records, our next records were going to have horns on them. It was just that simple. We werent the only ones that were doing it. But we felt really kindred to them in some respects. And Im really glad we did. We grew up to those guys. And I think the music reflects it. And you can hear our adulthoods creeping up on us, as you listen to those records, one after another. PCC: The Turtles fabulous harmonies - did those come naturally? Did you have to really work hard at that, especially in the beginning? KAYLAN: You know, it was always really natural to us. And I attribute that to Mr. Robert Wood, who was the choir director at Westchester High School, where Mark and myself and Chuck Portz all sang in the same a cappella choir together... and Al Nichol, too [all original Turtles]. Four of us were in the same choir together, under the tutorship of this brilliant music director, who taught us how to sight-read, who taught us very intricate harmonies. I stayed in that class and worked with him for most of the time I was in high school, and really learned more from him than any other teacher Ive ever had. So I have him to thank for those harmonies. Plus, youve got to remember, we grew up about four-and-a-half miles away from The Beach Boys. So we were very, very into the so-called L.A. sound and the California harmonies. They were just up the street. We didnt think anything about it. We always sang everything in three-part harmonies... or four-part. Or five, if we could find the notes. We would naturally lurch into harmonies, at the drop of a hat. That was the easiest part of making records for us. It still is. PCC: Hitting with It Aint Me Babe - wasnt it still a bit avant garde for a rock band to cover Dylan at that time? KAYLAN: I dont know about avant garde. The Byrds had done it. And we had gone to see them, as a group, about a week-and-half before we went into the studio with It Aint Me Babe. And it was the big new thing. And we bought an electric guitar, a 12-string Danelectro guitar, literally a day-and-a-half after we saw The Byrds perform on the Sunset Strip. And before the record company came to our next rehearsal and heard us doing all these folk-rocky songs. And they were the guys who said to us, Oh, my God! This is your niche. You guys should be doing folk-rock music. Youve gotta be singing protest stuff. Youve got to find the right protest songs. Well, we had been a folk band in high school, as well as a surf band, and we had written a whole bunch of very folky songs that we had stashed away in a drawer, because we just figured The Kingston Trio era was well over and there was nothing going to come along again and do that kind of folk thing for America. And then Dylan did. And all of a sudden, we were ready to go. We had a drawer full of folk-rock songs. They were just folk songs, when we wrote them. But now we had a drummer, so they were folk-rock songs, damn it! And literally, thats all we did was rock some of them up a little bit and we had all of the B-sides we needed. In fact, we had most of our first two albums already written and in the can, when we were signed. We just didnt know it. We just had no idea that folk-rock would be our direction. But we were ready to go. And we went through all of the Bob Dylan records that we could. And Phil Ochs. And everybody who was a voice in folk music at the time - Tim Hardin, Tim Buckley, people we admired, out of Greenwich Village for the most part. And we went back to the early Dylan stuff and found It Aint Me Babe and didnt realize that it was a country hit for Johnny Cash. I didnt listen to country music. I didnt have any idea. So we did a different arrangement on it that was angrier. It was a different sort of interpretation. It was almost a threatening It Aint Me Babe. And I took that from The Zombies, really. I was a huge fan of Colin Blunstone and I really enjoyed the way he sang Shes Not There. And I thought we could apply that very principle to It Aint Me Babe - to do very soft verses and then to break into the four/four chorus that wasnt minor anymore, that was a major chord and that sort of flipped the song around a little bit and then went back into minor and did it all again. So the pattern was very much the same as Shes Not There. And that soft-loud pattern continued through most of our career. And if you look at Happy Together and even Elenore, its the same. We really stuck to the same pattern for most of our career. We just disguised it from record to record. But we found something. We found a formula that worked for us. And now, when I hear people, even to this day, copy the formula, its great. You see Beyonce or somebody do a record like that and its based loosely around what we did, I smile. Its kind of like, Yeah! Somebody was listening. Somebody gets it! There was a reason that Happy Together was one of the top 50 records of the last century. Thats a very prideful statement from a mouse like me. I dont get off many prideful statements. Im not really boastful about anything. But that one, Ill boast about. Thats a biggie. PCC: Yeah, especially since so many artists had rejected Happy Together, before it came to The Turtles and you transformed it into something so special. Why do you think it had been turned down repeatedly? I dont think anybodys got an imagination out there, Paul, to be honest with you. I still dont. I feel like they hear whats on the demo record and if thats not exactly close to what they feel is the finished product, they dont have the imagination to picture themselves changing it or singing it differently. There are a lot of people like that who are big, big stars, that havent really changed the record much from the demo version that they got. I mean, you listen to the original demo of Patti Smiths Because The Night and it sounds an awful lot like the Springsteen record. Certain things are so good that they dont need to be changed. And some things you do have to figure out what makes them relevant in this decade, what makes them relevant to the Millennials or the people after that, in this generation. Why is the music of 50 years ago relevant at all today? Why should anybody be listening? It wasnt just because it was the Vietnam War. It wasnt just because it was the answer to Beatlemania. It was damned good music. And if no damned good music has been written since - and Im not saying that - Im just saying the proportion of music that I get to hear, that is terrific, is not necessarily as cumulative as it was back in the day. There arent that many great songs, that Ill stop the car and turn up the radio to listen to anymore. And its because Im old, but its also because the records dont take a lot of thought these days. You know? They really dont. And if you want to listen to records that mean something, if you want to listen to the lyrics by people who write lyrics, if you want to listen to a Bruno Mars song for instance, or a Taylor Swift song, youve got to figure out what station you need to listen to, if you want to hear it. Its not like you can turn on a hit radio station like we used to do back in the day and get Otis Redding and The Supremes and The Turtles and The Beach Boys and The Cryin Shames and whoever else was on the charts all at the same time and then decide who we liked. Now youve go to know what you like before you even turn the radio on. And I think thats kind of a shame. I think kids are missing about three-quarters of the music theyd really enjoy, if they were giving it a chance. PCC: In addition to the imagination, you had to have a lot of patience and perseverance to go through the process of months and months of finding the right arrangement for Happy Together. KAYLAN: Back in the day, you had labels that would support you for that amount of time, that would pay your rent or at least stick with you while you were trying to get that next record. It wasnt a matter of, Hey, you dont have a second record right out of the box, youre out! Nowadays, nobody can support a group for more than two records, if they dont have a hit right off the bat. And if youre indie and you have a hit right off the bat, then your labels going to be purchased in five minutes and youre not an indie anymore anyhow. PCC: What was the process of finding so many great tunes? You tapped into a number of great songwriters early in their careers. KAYLAN: Well, it wasnt as hard then as it is now. When you had a hit record in the 60s, 70s, you would get bombarded by outside material. We would receive maybe 100 to 200 discs every single week, that we would have to plow through, from writers. Some of them were Brill Building, very famous guys. And some of them were just coming up and had never had a hit before. And we listened to every one of them. Every one of them. And to be honest, we found more records from unknown than we did from famous ones. But we found Bob Lind and a lot of very progressive folk guys for that era - Rupert Holmes, just people who were kind of off the grid or were just beginning their songwriting career around that time. People were starting to submit records to us that were making more sense to us musically. As the 70 came in, and our time with Frank Zappa drew to an end, we had to kind of select what kind of a band we wanted to be all over again and come up with a career for Flo and Eddie. And that was a whole different can of worms. PCC: When you recorded the Outside Chance song, which is on the new 45 collection, that must have been one of first covers of one of Warren Zevons compositions. KAYLAN: Yeah, I think it was. If not the first, then certainly it wa among the first of the Warren Zevon covers. And I was thrilled to know him. He was a really great guy. And before we knew that he was a brilliant and talented writer and singer, he was a great guy first. So we used his song. In fact, we recorded a couple of his songs as B-sides, as well as Outside Chance as an A-side. And we felt bad for him that it didnt work, that Outside Chance wasnt a hit, so much so that we put a song of his on the B-side of our record, Can I Get To Know You Better. And when that didnt work we put the same B-side on the back of Happy Together, which was probably the biggest mistake we ever made, business-wise, just because we wanted Warren to make a couple of bucks. He really, really needed it. He was really, really down on his luck and very depressed. And he hadnt made a record yet. He was trying to get a duo off the ground. It was him and a girl singer. And they were having terrible luck. And he was living in squalor. And we thought, Weve got to help this guy. So we did. I dont regret it. I just think, business-wise, it was one of the stupidest things anybody has ever done. You get a record like Happy Together and you decide to put the same song on it that you put on the last B-side, just because you like the writer - youre insane. And youre also giving away, potentially, hundreds and hundreds of thousands of dollars... which we did. PCC: So you really knew as soon as it was recorded that Happy Together was going to be huge? In the case of Happy Together, we did. It was the only time ever, that we came out of a studio, even before the record was done, even before the horns got added, from the first vocal sessions, we knew exactly that it was a number one record. It was the only time that weve ever felt it, the only time that Ive ever known it to be a fact. Any other number one records that Ive been a part of, I have not heard that at all. I have never had that feeling. I didnt even have it coming out of the studio after Hungry Heart [the Springsteen smash] I didnt feel anything. We just looked at each other and went, Well, thats not going to work. Really, we thought it was a stiff. PCC: [Laughs] What about T. Rexs Bang A Gong, did that register? KAYLAN: Yeah, it registered, but only because I loved Marc Bolan so much. I mean, I was positive it was going to be a British hit, because he could have farted and and put it out as a record and had a British hit at the time. But you could have knocked me over with a feather, when it became a U.S. hit. That I was not expecting. Then I really thought hed be able to follow it up and the fact that he couldnt follow it up, that his record company wouldnt really allow him to follow it up... and he did it to himself by saying that he didnt need American radio and all that stuff. He made a couple of really dumb public statements. It kept him out of the big leagues. But I loved that guy. PCC: As far as the labels, is it true that Elenore was kind of a mischievous reaction to the record company wanting a Happy Together clone? KAYLAN: Mischievous is a very tame word. I would say it was a venomous response. A very venomous response. I gave them the most teenaged, cliched, hackneyed song I could possibly imagine. And I did it so it was as close to Happy Together as I could get it, because I was so sick and tired of these guys. We were coming out with Top 10 records, every record out of the box. And it wasnt enough for them. They kept saying, Give us another Happy Together. Well, whats the difference? Well, that was a number one, thats the difference. Jesus, dont you think wed be doing number ones, if we could? We dont want to making number fours. We want number ones, for Gods sakes. So just out of frustration, I locked myself in a room and wrote Elenore with the most teenaged lyrics I could - pride and joy, etcetera., which was originally fab and gear etcetera, even more teenaged than the one we used. But I wanted to show them how inane songs could be and how childish they were in trying to get us to record another teenage lament. But instead of seeing the stupidity, they listened to it and went, This is the best song youve ever written. And they spared no expense and promoted the thing. And the record, to be honest, was a beautiful-sounding record. It was a great-sounding thing. Then it was part of the bigger Battle of the Bands album, in which all of the songs were impeccable, as far as I was concerned. But I didnt expect Elenore to be as big a hit as it was. And I certainly didnt expect it internationally to be the record that it turned out to be, because Elenore, as a girls name, translates into any language. And you cant believe the royalty checks I get from the countries I never heard of in my life, where that record was a hit. PCC: Battle of the Bands was such a cool concept - adopting so many different musical styles - did you see that as daring at the time? That must have upset the label, I would imagine. KAYLAN: Yeah, it did upset them a little bit. It was daring at the time. However, if they had known what to do, they could have sold it. The fact is, they didnt have the confidence in the album that they should have had. That was part of it. I blame the second part on ourselves. I think that, had we been smart enough to flip the graphics, to put the outside of the gatefold of the album on the inside cover and vice versa, we would have sold a lot more records, because the inside of the album was us as 12 different groups, in 12 different costumes, dressed as all of those guys in the battle of the bands. And when you couldnt see it, because the cover was just us in tuxedoes, welcoming everybody inside, to the record, then you didnt really get the joke. And I think we were too close to it to understand that people need to whacked upside the head with a fish every once in a while. PCC: Do you think the humor of the band was one of the reasons you were able to so smoothly segue from shows like Shindig to shows like Merv Griffin and Mike Douglas? KAYLAN: Yeah I do. The fact that we didnt have a teenage idol in the band, the fact that we had no threatening members, that we werent a dark group at all, that we recorded happy music, that we could sit on a panel and talk to Mike Douglas and Truman Capote and Mary Tyler Moore and Leslie Uggams and people who were outside of our sphere, was something that television producers really welcomed. They had not seen too many articulate rock groups come through. So all of a sudden, we were doing a lot more panels than other bands were. And we were getting laughs and people were remembering us and booking us back again. I cant imagine the amount of times that we did The Mike Douglas Show. I cant even compute it. But I know it was more than 10 - maybe 15 or 20 times, certainly every time we put out a record, whether it was a hit record or not, or every time we swung through the East Coast, whether we were on tour promoting something or just in the neighborhood, we would always do The Mike Douglas Show It was just something that you did. And it was a wonderful era in fact, for groups, in the 60s, because everybody had a television show. Everybody. So we got to know everybody from Johnny Carson to Joan Rivers. It was great. And we still know a lot of those people. And it still comes in handy every once in a while, to pull out the names. PCC: Youre still performing with Mark Volman these days. How have the satisfactions changed for you? KAYLAN: We do great. We do great on the road. Im sure if we did more than three months at a time, we would have a lot more profitable business than we choose to maintain, but with Mark doing teaching nine months a year, at Belmont University in Nashville - he teaches music business - it kind of precludes us from touring. And thats great, as far as Im concerned. It was never anything that I particularly enjoyed. Once I get to the auditorium and Im on stage doing the show, I really, really enjoy it. But the travel part of it has gotten a lot more difficult in the last few years. Security, and the waiting in the lines and all that stuff - it kind of takes the fun out of it. So this last time around, we did everything in buses. We had three giant tour buses. And Ive been trying to avoid doing tour buses for as long as I can remember. And I couldnt this year. So, for the next couple of years, as long as this tour continues, on a summer basis, I guess well be doing buses and seeing how it goes. PCC: With all youve achieved, any unfulfilled musical dreams? KAYLAN: Unfulfilled musical dreams... you know, I dont think so. At least not as far as performance is concerned. Theres always that threat looming over your head of finding that perfect song that would make the perfect record for 19-whatever... or 2000-whatever. And thats always there. But you really stop and think about the realities of the situation, to go into a recording studio, at the age of 67 years old, and trying to make a record that will compete against a 15-year-old kid whos really got the hunger, A - its something I wouldnt take away from the 15-year-old. B - I believe that my relevance, when it comes to making singles, is ludicrous at this age. C - it would really not be a fulfilling thing for me, even it did work, just because Ive gone through that process before. Its been a lot more rewarding for me to release a book that sold quite a few units and to put out a movie that did really well on the festival circuit, do that kind of thing. Im much more intrigued with something new, that I havent had success or failure in, quite frankly. So Im willing to fail next time around with a novel or with a dramatic script. But I want to do something new. Doing something Ive already done at all, including something musical, I think would just sort of be extra, something that I dont really need to do, nor do I crave to do. I dont want to act. I dont want to produce. I dont want to direct. I dont want to teach. I dont want to do any of those things. Maybe the bottom line here is Im incredibly lazy and I dont want to do anything. PCC: Its got to be gratifying to look back and see all youve accomplished in so many areas of music, such a variety. KAYLAN: It really is. That part of its wonderful. Its a legacy for my children and my grandchildren. I feel that Ive done what I can to walk heavy on the planet and to leave at least light footsteps, wherever I've been treading, so that the name may be forgotten, but the music will not. And thats all anybody can hope for in a lifetime on this Earth. And thats all I think I ever wanted to achieve, from the age of five years old. So that dream has been accomplished and Im feeling very good about my life at this time. And I really dont want to plan anything, because everything thats gone well for me has been unplanned. For info on the latest spontaneous happenings, visit howardkaylan.com. |